A systematic review is a comprehensive review of primary research on a specific research question in order to compile and analyze all relevant evidence. It reveals validity of data, study methods, and funding sources of research. TUN offers Cochrane Interactive Learning to all and is available on our A-Z Database list and here, https://training.cochrane.org/ (be sure to use your TUN email when creating an account).
Systematic Reviews management software.
Sign up for Free Trial and request access to Touro University Nevada by emailing the library at tun.library@touro.edu.
A comprehensive online platform that facilitates the entire systematic review process from protocol to report. Also includes team and contributor management for effective and efficient collaboration.
To access JBI Sumari, you must create an account and use that to login when using this link. It is a personal account for this resource, and will be required in addition to logging in through OpenAthens. Simply click the link for "Register New User" and fill out the form.
First, determine that your research is at the stage to conduct a systematic review before starting the Systematic Review process. You will also need to assemble your team. Consult the PRISMA 2020 checklist for more detailed steps.
General overview of the Steps of a Systematic Review video by Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health
Effectiveness Reviews - A Synthesis of quantitative evidence to analyze the effectiveness of a treatment.
Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review - Evaluates the quality of published studies to provide a summary of test performance
Etiology and Risk Review - An assessment of the relationship between certain factors and the development of a disease or condition or other health outcome.
Costs/Economic Evidence Review - A review of evidence from economic evaluations that addresses a question or questions about the cost-effectiveness of a health intervention.
Prevalence or Incidence Review - Summarizes epidemiological studies to assess the prevalence or incidence of a clinical condition.
Mixed Methods Review - A synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data.
Qualitative Evidence Reviews - A synthesis of qualitative evidence from interviews, observations, focus groups, and field work where studies are conducted in a subject's natural setting in order to inform healthcare decision-making.
Umbrella Review - A systematic review of systematic review. Includes a broad range of reviews conducted for potential interventions to establish pros and cons and potential outcomes of each treatment.
Meta-Synthesis - To formulate a new interpretation of the research field by bringing together qualitative data. It primarily generates theories for programs, implementation, or interventions.
Rapid Reviews - A form of synthesizing evidence in a shorter time period than other Systematic Review types. Typically done in a short time frame and omits stages from the rigorous Systematic Review process.